Marquardt (2007) proposes that the right questions cannot only remove burdens from a manager but also liberate workers to think creatively about issues or problems.
Given this weekâ€™s required readings and your further research, complete a 750-1,000 word Literature Synthesis
Critically evaluates key arguments from both a scholarly and a practitioner-oriented point of view;
Critiques underlying assumptions evident in the articles and identifies any new insights for practice and scholarship;
Extends the thinking and application of your review with additional resources and experiential analyses.
Consider in your synthesis the various perspectives on diversity and their meaning for leaders in organisations. Your Literature Synthesis will be brought to the Learning Set for further consideration to inform the problematising of the workplace-based problem you have chosen for this moduleâ€™s CAL Project.
Citation and references
of Great Questions
Asking rather than telling has become the key to leadership success.
The late Peter Drucker, a renowned management consultant, noted that
the leader of the past may have been a person who knew how to tell, but the leader of the future will be a person who knows how to ask. Too few leaders lead with questions. They tend to dictate or debate rather than inquire and discuss.
With the growing complexity and speed of change in the world today,
a leader simply wonâ€™t know enough
to adequately tell his subordinates or colleagues what to do. In todayâ€™s tur- bocharged environment, no one can master all the data needed to address all globally complex problems.
Although providing employees with answers to their problems may seem the most efficient way to get things done, the short-term gain will be over- shadowed by the long-term costs. By responding with statements, you may not only impede the development of your colleagues or direct reports, but also deprive yourself of access to new and powerful ideas.
So when you are faced with an em- ployeeâ€™s problem, you should respond
The right questions
Asking the right questions depends on what you want to accomplish. Choose questions that inspire people to act in new ways, expand their range of vision, and enable them to contribute more to the organization.
Powerful questions are usually open-endedâ€”they are not looking for a specific answer. They often begin with why, how, or what do you think aboutâ€¦? They help people to discover answers, which develops responsibility.
Avoid using confrontational ques- tionsâ€”ones that are negative, put people into a defensive mode, and drain energy. Asking, â€œwhatâ€™s wrong?â€ threatens self-esteem and discourages honesty, creativity, and collaboration.
So instead of asking what went wrong, ask questions that focus on what has gone well, what could be done, and how it could be improved. The focus re- mains on improvement and continuous learning rather than complaining and venting. By being open-minded and positive, you encourage a broader range of responses.
When asking questions, keep your focus on the question, not on the mil- lion other concerns you may have. Donâ€™t listen and think of the next thing you are going to ask or say at the same time. Ask questions that open new possibilities, explore perceptions and assumptions, and provide new ways to evaluate the same data. You must be genuinely curious and not make the employee feel as though he is being judged, interrogated, or manipulated.
92 | T+D | February2007
By michael J. marquardt
by asking the right questions. Through these questions, you can help people find the best solutions themselves as well as help them gain self-confidence for future challenges.
Try to ask one question at a time. Too often, we overwhelm or confuse people by asking several questions simultane- ously. Allow for a response before asking the next question. Many of us ask ques- tions simultaneously because we want to maintain control, are unsure when we get the next opportunity to ask a question, or want to control or manipu- late the response to the first question.
Such an approach leads to poor quality responses. People resist multiple questions because they feel like they are being interrogated. Inexperienced or impatient people ask a flurry of ques- tions with a desire to control rather than to seek the truth.
Donâ€™t rush the responses to your questions. Allow time for reflection when formulating questions, because not all questions need to be answered immediately. Give people time to mull over your request for information and to develop some ideas. Putting them under a tight deadline inhibits creative thinking. Time permitting, itâ€™s better to say, â€œLetâ€™s get together in a few days and bounce this around. In the meantime, give it some thought. I would like to have a few suggestions to check out.â€
The quality of the response is af- fected not only by the content of the question, but also by its manner of delivery, especially pace and timing. Be genuinely curious. Try to main- tain a steady pace. Do not let your eye contact waiver and donâ€™t be afraid of silence. Silence tells the other person that you expect her to respond and to continue. Providing time and silence allows the other person to dig deeper into her thought process to answer the question.
We often feel compelled to give constructive feedback rather than ask positive questions. If construc- tive feedback is needed, the best approach is to ask people what they think should be worked on. In most situations, people are aware of their shortcomings. When those areas are enumerated by them, you can suggest working on the one or two you think
would be most beneficial. This makes you a coach, not a judge.
Donâ€™t shout or raise your voice when asking questions. Often the softer the question is asked, the more powerful it isâ€”unlike statements that may be more effective and have greater impact when delivered loud and strong. Use encour- aging words.
Say â€œthank youâ€ when you get a re- sponse. Youâ€™ll likely get more and deep- er answers the next time you ask. When your questions respect peopleâ€™s thought process, you support their questioning of long-held assumptions. It is much harder to ask skillful questions than to give advice. For years, managers have received positive feedback for having the answers and giving advice. But our answers work for us. The goal of ques- tioning is for the employee to find the answer that works best for him.
Great questions empower people and instill in them a sense of their own strength and efficacy. When you are truly asking, you are sending the mes- sage that the subordinateâ€™s ideas are good or maybe even better than your own. In addition to conveying respect, it encourages the personâ€™s development as a thinker and problem solver.
The most effective questions:
â€¢ create clarity (Can you explain
â€¢ construct better working and
personal relations (How have sales
â€¢ help people think analytically and
critically (What are the conse-
quences of going this route?)
â€¢ inspire people to reflect and see things in fresh, unpredictable
ways (Why does this strategy
â€¢ encourage breakthrough thinking
(Can that be improved?)
â€¢ challenge assumptions (Why do we
always choose this method?) â€¢ create ownership of solutions.
(Based upon your experience, what do you suggest we do here?)
What not to ask
Questions that focus on why a person did not and cannot succeed force him to take a defensive or reactive stance and strip him of power. Such questions shut down opportunities for success and do not allow people to clarify mis- understandings or to achieve goals. These questions include
â€¢ Why are you late in delivering this product?
â€¢ What is your problem in implementing this program within budget?
â€¢ Who is not doing their part? â€¢ Donâ€™t you know any better
Likewise, leading questions that seek
a specific answer put the other person in a negative light, push the question- erâ€™s agenda, and exert social pressure to force agreement. These types of questionsâ€”You wanted to do this by yourself, didnâ€™t you?, Donâ€™t you agree that John is the problem?, or Everyone else thinks this is the proper analysis of the situation, why donâ€™t you?â€”inhibit people from answering candidly and stifle honest discussion.
Leaders who are unaware of the potential of questions needlessly en- gage in a fractious, pressure-filled exis- tence. Leaders who lead with questions will create a more humane workplace as well as a more successful business. Leaders who use questions successfully will truly empower people and change organizations.
Michael J. Marquardt is president of the World Institute for Action Learning and a professor at George Washington University; email@example.com. This article is based on his book Leading with Questions.
Send submissions to Development, T+D, 1640 King Street, box 1443, alexandria, Va 22313-2043; firstname.lastname@example.org.
February 2007 | T+D | 93
Our Service Charter
Excellent Quality / 100% Plagiarism-FreeWe employ a number of measures to ensure top quality essays. The papers go through a system of quality control prior to delivery. We run plagiarism checks on each paper to ensure that they will be 100% plagiarism-free. So, only clean copies hit customers’ emails. We also never resell the papers completed by our writers. So, once it is checked using a plagiarism checker, the paper will be unique. Speaking of the academic writing standards, we will stick to the assignment brief given by the customer and assign the perfect writer. By saying “the perfect writer” we mean the one having an academic degree in the customer’s study field and positive feedback from other customers.
Free RevisionsWe keep the quality bar of all papers high. But in case you need some extra brilliance to the paper, here’s what to do. First of all, you can choose a top writer. It means that we will assign an expert with a degree in your subject. And secondly, you can rely on our editing services. Our editors will revise your papers, checking whether or not they comply with high standards of academic writing. In addition, editing entails adjusting content if it’s off the topic, adding more sources, refining the language style, and making sure the referencing style is followed.
Confidentiality / 100% No DisclosureWe make sure that clients’ personal data remains confidential and is not exploited for any purposes beyond those related to our services. We only ask you to provide us with the information that is required to produce the paper according to your writing needs. Please note that the payment info is protected as well. Feel free to refer to the support team for more information about our payment methods. The fact that you used our service is kept secret due to the advanced security standards. So, you can be sure that no one will find out that you got a paper from our writing service.
Money Back GuaranteeIf the writer doesn’t address all the questions on your assignment brief or the delivered paper appears to be off the topic, you can ask for a refund. Or, if it is applicable, you can opt in for free revision within 14-30 days, depending on your paper’s length. The revision or refund request should be sent within 14 days after delivery. The customer gets 100% money-back in case they haven't downloaded the paper. All approved refunds will be returned to the customer’s credit card or Bonus Balance in a form of store credit. Take a note that we will send an extra compensation if the customers goes with a store credit.
24/7 Customer SupportWe have a support team working 24/7 ready to give your issue concerning the order their immediate attention. If you have any questions about the ordering process, communication with the writer, payment options, feel free to join live chat. Be sure to get a fast response. They can also give you the exact price quote, taking into account the timing, desired academic level of the paper, and the number of pages.