PHILOSOPHY AND RELIGION MAJOR
2000-LEVEL ESSAY MARKING RUBRIC
Inadequate Pass (50-64)
Basic Credit (65-74)
Sound Dist. (75-84)
Good Hi. Dist. (85-
The ultimate criterion in marking an Essay is: How good is the studentâ€™s discussion of the question, with reference to their general writing, their understanding of the primary readings, and their discussion of the issue? This is determined by consideration of more specific sub-criteria:
â€“ Referencing, etc
â€“ Structure, etc Inadequate use of general academic standards. Very many mistakes re sub-criteria Basic use of general academic standards. Quite a few mistakes re sub-criteria Sound use of general academic standards.
Some mistakes re sub-criteria Good use of general academic standards. Few mistakes re sub-criteria Excellent use of general academic standards. Very few if any mistakes re
(50%), with sub- criteria:
â€“ Active Understandâ€™g Student displays very little if any understanding of the reading, with significant inaccuracies Student displays basic understanding of the reading, but exposition is marred by some inaccuracies Student displays sound understanding of the reading, with very few inaccuracies Student displays good understanding, with a competent mode of exposition. Student displays excellent understanding, with a creative mode of exposition.
(20%), based on further readings, or original, with sub- criteria:
â€“ Effectiveness Student has done very little if any extra relevant research or original thinking, and what there is makes very little if any contribution to the issue Student has done some extra relevant research or original thinking, and what there is makes some contribution to the issue Student has done some extra relevant research or original thinking, and what there is makes a competent contribution to the issue Student has done (given the word limit) much extra relevant research or original thinking, and what there is makes a good contribution to the issue Student has done (given the word limit) very much extra relevant research or original thinking, and what there is makes the marker think.
The sub-criteria will be evaluated as follows:
WRITINGâ€”NOTE: This refers to the General Presentation of the Essay
â€“ Referencing, etc (quote format, quote page nos., footnotes, bibliography, TURNITIN): How good is the formatting of the quotes (short quotes in text, long quotes in blocks)? Do ALL quote references include page numbers? How relevant are any footnotes? Is there a bibliography, and how well formatted is it? How high is the TURNITIN originality score, and how indicative is this of poor referencing practices?
â€“ Presentation (length, grammar, spelling, punctuation, expression): What is the paperâ€™s word count, and is within 5% of the word limit? On average, how many errors of grammar, spelling and punctuation are there per page?
How good is the essayâ€™s overall expression?
â€“ Structure, etc (introduction; fluency, sectioning, flagging devices; paragraphs): Does the introduction to the essay address the set question, and indicate what the essay will do? How fluent are the transitions between paragraphs? How well does the essay fall into neatly divisible sections? How often does the essay flag to the reader what is happening? How often do paragraphs have topic sentences, and how often does its content focus solely on that topic?
EXPOSITION (of Primary Readings)â€”NOTE: Exposition of a Primary Reading includes the presentation of a point of view, possibly with examples and justification for that view, and any objections and responses, which that reading itself contains.
â€“ Quantity: How much space is devoted to the Exposition of the Primary Readings, ie the oneâ€™s marked â€œâ€¢â€ in the reading list (roughly, at least one-third of the essay)?
â€“ Accuracy: How accurately has the student described the contents of those readings?
School of Humanities and Social Science
â€“ Active Understanding: How intellectually active has the student been in re-presenting material from those readings? (NB. Avoid passive description of the readings, by, eg, trying to explain the ideas in your own terms).
DISCUSSION (with Other Readings, or of an Original Nature)â€”NOTE: Other Discussion of an issue includes critical discussion of any readings which is sourced from some Non-Primary Reading; Original Discussion of an issue includes critical discussion of any readings which the student comes up with for themselves.
â€“ Quantity: How much space is devoted to critically discussing the issue, based on other Readings, or based on the studentâ€™s own ideas?
â€“ Relevance: How relevant is the discussion, and how often is a justification for any new claims introduced? Such justifications may include the presentation of new evidence, examples, or arguments.
â€“ Effectiveness: Objectively, how good (effective) are the relevant justifications?
Our Service Charter
Excellent Quality / 100% Plagiarism-FreeWe employ a number of measures to ensure top quality essays. The papers go through a system of quality control prior to delivery. We run plagiarism checks on each paper to ensure that they will be 100% plagiarism-free. So, only clean copies hit customers’ emails. We also never resell the papers completed by our writers. So, once it is checked using a plagiarism checker, the paper will be unique. Speaking of the academic writing standards, we will stick to the assignment brief given by the customer and assign the perfect writer. By saying “the perfect writer” we mean the one having an academic degree in the customer’s study field and positive feedback from other customers.
Free RevisionsWe keep the quality bar of all papers high. But in case you need some extra brilliance to the paper, here’s what to do. First of all, you can choose a top writer. It means that we will assign an expert with a degree in your subject. And secondly, you can rely on our editing services. Our editors will revise your papers, checking whether or not they comply with high standards of academic writing. In addition, editing entails adjusting content if it’s off the topic, adding more sources, refining the language style, and making sure the referencing style is followed.
Confidentiality / 100% No DisclosureWe make sure that clients’ personal data remains confidential and is not exploited for any purposes beyond those related to our services. We only ask you to provide us with the information that is required to produce the paper according to your writing needs. Please note that the payment info is protected as well. Feel free to refer to the support team for more information about our payment methods. The fact that you used our service is kept secret due to the advanced security standards. So, you can be sure that no one will find out that you got a paper from our writing service.
Money Back GuaranteeIf the writer doesn’t address all the questions on your assignment brief or the delivered paper appears to be off the topic, you can ask for a refund. Or, if it is applicable, you can opt in for free revision within 14-30 days, depending on your paper’s length. The revision or refund request should be sent within 14 days after delivery. The customer gets 100% money-back in case they haven't downloaded the paper. All approved refunds will be returned to the customer’s credit card or Bonus Balance in a form of store credit. Take a note that we will send an extra compensation if the customers goes with a store credit.
24/7 Customer SupportWe have a support team working 24/7 ready to give your issue concerning the order their immediate attention. If you have any questions about the ordering process, communication with the writer, payment options, feel free to join live chat. Be sure to get a fast response. They can also give you the exact price quote, taking into account the timing, desired academic level of the paper, and the number of pages.