Discussion Response in Business 5
Discussion response to 3 original post. 1/2 page per topicâ€¦.APA format.
(1) LEARNING ACTIVITY 2 to Respond to (RW)
First off, I recommend viewing this video of the Boeing 787 Dreamliner because itâ€™s awesome! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CwxGDdsI_bU&feature=youtu.be . Itâ€™s
amazing how far flight has come, and Iâ€™m in agreeance with Klaus Brauer, Boeingâ€™s Director of Passenger Satisfaction, when he said â€œitâ€™s unfortunate that flight is no
longer looked at as [a] magical [experience]â€ during his interview with CBS news reporter Hattie Kauffman.
a) The short interview clip about the Boeing 787 showed evidence that the teams involved with the creation and development of the 787 used the creative decision making
process. First off, they identified the problem which was unsatisfied customers due to little to no room inside the cabin of aircrafts. Which lets face it, noone likes
flying unless they are flying first class, and even first class flying is not particularly something that passengers want to embark on. Of course if one is required to
travel, than first class would definitely be the way to go, but itâ€™s not realistic travel for the lot of us (assumingly). Cramped seating, little leg room, food trays
that come down and make you feel like a T-rex eating with little armsâ€¦does not sound that appealing. After Boeing identified the problem, immersion takes place by
the gathering of information. For example, interviewing customers about their thoughts on airlines and their services. Then the incubation sat in, meaning that each
individual involved sets aside the problem, but is unconsciously working on what can be done to solve the problem. After this step was Boeingâ€™s Eureka moment, or the
illumination moment, or the â€œAH HA!â€ moment. Letâ€™s rebuild the interior of the plane, Boeing thought. Questions like where can we make room for passengers? How can we
make the passengers feel like they have more room and comfortability, etc. Then verification and application came in. In other words the decision maker consciously
verified the feasibility of revamping the interior of Boeing passenger planes and implements the decision to do so. Itâ€™s clear that the creative decision making
process was used during Boeingâ€™s revamp of their passenger planes because Bauer explains what his company has done to make flight magical again, and how they went
about obtaining the information about the problem and what can be done to fix the problem.
b) Itâ€™s highly unlikely that Boeing, a leading manufacturer of commercial jetliners, was not aware of how small the seats are and how much customers do not like them.
After all that was customersâ€™ main complaint throughout the CBS video, and no company is going to revamp a whole commercial airliner to increase customer satisfaction
when they donâ€™t know the complaints that customers had in the first place. In other words, Boeing was likely aware of how customers felt about the seating arrangements
in commercial airliners. This is concluded also because Boeingâ€™s design of the 787 focused on creating, what feels like to fliers, more room.
As mentioned in this weekâ€™s reading, creativity has three elements in decision making that researchers focus on. They are fluency, flexibility, and originality
(Organizational Behavior, 2014, p 465). Although each is defined separately and looked at individually by researchers , the combination of these three factors are, and
can be used, during the decision making process. Furthermore, a combination of these elements will help teams, groups, departments, and/or organizations reach their
maximum potential on a specific task because these elements of creativity each deploy their own focus and approach throughout the decision making process. Itâ€™s highly
likely that those individuals involved in the interior design of the 787 brought each of the aforementioned creative elements to the table. A larger restroom, for
example, can be a combination of both originality and fluency. Or in other words the amount of ideas generated from one individual and the ideaâ€™s uniqueness
(Organizational Behavior, 2014, p 465).
(2) Learning Activity 2 to Respond to (GH)
Has there been a time in which you have had a conflict either at work or at school? Describe the conflict and state what type of conflict it was.
I have been exposed to several conflicts within my career. The most common conflicts that we have in todayï¿½ï¿½ï¿½s military is from limited resources (mostly due to lack of
With that on the table, I will discuss the most common type of conflict, the intergroup conflict (Organizational Behavior, 2014). The intergroup conflict that happens
frequently in the Navy and is normally related to the lack time. These types of conflicts are normally functional and productive in the long run.
In the Navy you have a set routine every day. You all request slots of time via a Planning Board for Training (PB4T). The problem that normally arises is the multiple
requirements that are stacked on top of each other. Every department thinks his requirement is the most important to seeing the command succeed and so the conflict
ensures. This board is governed by the Executive Officer (XO) to whom each department must plead their case and work together to plan around each requirement.
Although most of the discussions do get heated, we as a group usually negotiate the schedule to the best of our ability and the XO steps in when we canï¿½ï¿½ï¿½t come to
resolution. We experience all levels of cooperation. The different departments will apply several levels of conflict handling styles to include accommodation,
collaboration, compromise, competition, and even avoidance (Organizational Behavior, 2014).
To what extent do you attempt to satisfy your own concerns when youï¿½ï¿½ï¿½re trying to resolve a conflict?
Normally, we at the Department Head level we will try to not put our concerns about what is good for the command. We do negotiate resolution as best as possible to
meet mission requirements. That being said, not always is this easy.
To what extent do you attempt to satisfy the other partyï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ concerns when youï¿½ï¿½ï¿½re trying to resolve a conflict?
Much like the answer above, in my organization putting your needs or anotherï¿½ï¿½ï¿½s needs in front of the commands needs is not practiced very often, but it does happen. We
try to limit this and use the XO to moderate.
Organizational Behavior (2014). Washington, D.C.: The Saylor Foundation
(3) Learning Activity #2 to Respond to (PB)
What evidence did you see of creativity in the decision making process used in designing the Boeing 787? What process would you have used to improve creativity in the
Boing was creative in a few ways in designing their new 787? We can see evidence of creativity in the interior layout in the plane, the mood lighting, the seats, the
bathroom with the window, the dimming windows, and much more we still have to see. They have done a great job thus far to improve our experience during our flight. I
personally would ask frequent flyers what they would appreciate in the new 787. I would also send members of the design team all over the world to try and get an idea
on what to make new based on the different cultural views (Cooper,2014). This would help ensure that not only the American passengers would enjoy the new 787 but also
the rest of the world.
Passengers interviewed in the clip all seemed to want bigger seats, yet the seats in the 787 Dreamliner are not any bigger. Since it seems unlikely that Boeing was not
aware of the desire for bigger seats, why do you suppose larger seats were not included in the design, yet larger restrooms were?
By making the seats bigger Boing would be losing passenger capacity and thus carrying less people. This could mean two things that either Boing would be losing money
on each trip, which is highly unlikely, or they prices of the tickets would go up. Boing resolved the seat issues by making the seats thinner in the areas where we now
find the most discomfort so although, the seat space is the same it may feel bigger and more comfortable because there is a little extra legroom. The restrooms didnï¿½ï¿½ï¿½t
seem much bigger than the current ones. Also, the may have been able to make the bathrooms wider since they could have extended them further into the corridor of the
place, where there are no seats anyways. Lastly, being able to look outside will help people feel less claustrophobic.
Our Service Charter
Excellent Quality / 100% Plagiarism-FreeWe employ a number of measures to ensure top quality essays. The papers go through a system of quality control prior to delivery. We run plagiarism checks on each paper to ensure that they will be 100% plagiarism-free. So, only clean copies hit customers’ emails. We also never resell the papers completed by our writers. So, once it is checked using a plagiarism checker, the paper will be unique. Speaking of the academic writing standards, we will stick to the assignment brief given by the customer and assign the perfect writer. By saying “the perfect writer” we mean the one having an academic degree in the customer’s study field and positive feedback from other customers.
Free RevisionsWe keep the quality bar of all papers high. But in case you need some extra brilliance to the paper, here’s what to do. First of all, you can choose a top writer. It means that we will assign an expert with a degree in your subject. And secondly, you can rely on our editing services. Our editors will revise your papers, checking whether or not they comply with high standards of academic writing. In addition, editing entails adjusting content if it’s off the topic, adding more sources, refining the language style, and making sure the referencing style is followed.
Confidentiality / 100% No DisclosureWe make sure that clients’ personal data remains confidential and is not exploited for any purposes beyond those related to our services. We only ask you to provide us with the information that is required to produce the paper according to your writing needs. Please note that the payment info is protected as well. Feel free to refer to the support team for more information about our payment methods. The fact that you used our service is kept secret due to the advanced security standards. So, you can be sure that no one will find out that you got a paper from our writing service.
Money Back GuaranteeIf the writer doesn’t address all the questions on your assignment brief or the delivered paper appears to be off the topic, you can ask for a refund. Or, if it is applicable, you can opt in for free revision within 14-30 days, depending on your paper’s length. The revision or refund request should be sent within 14 days after delivery. The customer gets 100% money-back in case they haven't downloaded the paper. All approved refunds will be returned to the customer’s credit card or Bonus Balance in a form of store credit. Take a note that we will send an extra compensation if the customers goes with a store credit.
24/7 Customer SupportWe have a support team working 24/7 ready to give your issue concerning the order their immediate attention. If you have any questions about the ordering process, communication with the writer, payment options, feel free to join live chat. Be sure to get a fast response. They can also give you the exact price quote, taking into account the timing, desired academic level of the paper, and the number of pages.