â€¢ As a result, Churchman developed five assumptions for a systems approach that systems thinkers should take into account when they consider and seek to understand a system (Churchman, 1968, p.29)
â€™â€™ 1. the total system objectives and, more specifically, the performance measures of the whole system;
2. the systemâ€™s environment: the fixed constraints;
3. the resources of the system;
4. the components of the system, their activities, goals and measures of performance;
5. the management of the system.â€™â€™
While Thorndike posited, â€œresponses to stimuli are strengthened when followed by satisfying consequencesâ€ (p.114), his predecessor Pavlov established that â€œstimuli could be conditioned to elicit responses by being paired with other stimuliâ€ (p.114). Guthrie suggested that a â€œcontiguous relation between stimulus and responseâ€ (p.114) was created so that a behaviour was repeated whenever the associated situation occurred.
â€“ According to Shuell (1986), cognitive theorists see learning as â€œan active, constructive, and goal-oriented process that is dependent upon the mental activities of the learnerâ€ (p.415), which contrasts to the behaviourist notion of the learner as a passive subject driven by environmental stimuli
â€“ Hartley (1998) emphasised how â€œlearning results from inferences, expectations and making connectionsâ€ and that â€œinstead of acquiring habits, learners acquire plans and strategies, and prior knowledge is importantâ€™ (p.18).
â€“ Schunk (2012) notes that â€œconstructivism does not propound that learning principles exist and are to be discovered and tested, but rather that learners create their own learningâ€ (p.230).
â€“ According to Powell and Kalina (2009), â€œPiagetâ€™s cognitive constructivism theory incorporates the importance of understanding what each individual needs to get knowledge and learn at his or her own paceâ€™â€™
â€“ Dewey de?ned re?ection as â€œactive, persistent and careful consideration of any belief or supposed form of knowledge in the light of the grounds that support it and the further conclusion to which it tendsâ€ (Dewey, 1933, p.9).
â€“ This was evident in later descriptions of reflection, such as the one offered by Boud et al. (1985, p.19) who defined it as â€œA generic term for those intellectual and affective activities in which individual engage to explore their experiences in order to lead to new understandings and appreciation.â€
â€“ With the idea of reflection having become central to the notion of reflective learning, the latter came to be seen as â€œan intentional social process, where context and experience are acknowledged, in which learners are active individuals, wholly present, engaging with others, open to challenge, and the outcome involves transformation as well as improvement for both individuals and their environmentâ€ (Brockbank and McGill, p.36)
In addition, Maqsood, Finegan and Walker (2001) identified five case studies within the construction industry where managers and/or contractors could benefit from undertaking a SSM to ensure more was learned about the â€œstructures, processes, perceptions and beliefsâ€ (p. 4)
â€“ For example, Fleming and Hiple (2004) pointed out that earlier conventional definitions of DE were applied to contexts where there was physical distance between the tutor and the student requiring them to use a method of communication that could bridge time and/or space. However, as communication technologies advanced, definitions became increasingly characterised by â€œadditional criteria and more finely drawn distinctionsâ€ (Fleming and Hiple, 2004, p. 64).
â€“ For a formal and more precise definition, an ODE can be defined as â€œan educational modality that mainly takes place mediated by interactions via the Internet and associated technologiesâ€ (Borba et al., 2010, p. 1).
To ensure clarity, terms commonly associated in the discourse within which ODE is embedded are explained in the table below:
Open Learning (OL) (Bates, 2005, p.5):
â€¢ â€œOpen learning is primarily a goal, or an educational policy.
â€¢ â€œAn essential characteristic of open learning is the removal of barriers to learningâ€ (including prior qualifications and support for learners with disabilities)
â€¢ Ideally, it should be universally accessible. Thus it â€œmust be scalable as well as flexibleâ€
â€¢ Suitable technologies must be available to facilitate OL
DE (DE) (Tomei, 2010, p.82):
â€¢ â€œA generic term that includes the range of teaching/learning strategies used by correspondence colleges, open universities, distance departments of conventional colleges or universities, and distance training units of corporate providers.â€
â€¢ â€œIt is a term for the education of those who choose not to attend the schools, colleges and universities of the world but study at their home, or sometimes at their workplace.â€
Flexible Learning (FL) (Bates, 2005, p.5):
â€¢ FL â€œis the provision of learning in a flexible manner, built around the geographical, social and time constraints of individual learners, rather than those of an educational institutionâ€
â€¢ FL â€œmay include DE, but it also may include delivering face-to-face training in the workplace or opening the campus longer hours or organizing weekend or summer schoolsâ€™â€™.
Online Education (Tomei, 2010, p.166):
â€¢ â€œA web-based approach to education in which students access online resources and communicate with instructors and other students through computer- mediated communication.â€
â€¢ â€œOnline education can be part of DE, but online education does not encompass DE.â€
E-learning (Tomei, 2010, p.86):
â€¢ â€œAllows for Internet-enabled learning or DE over communication networks. It involves the use of network or Internet technologies to create, deliver, and facilitate learning anytime and anywhere.â€
â€¢ â€œE-learning allows delivery of individualized, comprehensive, complex, and dynamic learning content in real time, aiding the development of communities of knowledge and linking learners and practitioners with experts.â€
â€“ One particular source of confusion is the conflation of e-learning and DE, which encompasses ODE (Guri-Rosenbilt & Gros, 2011). E-learning, which is related to instructional technology (Larremendy-Joerns & Leinhardt, 2006) is not totally aimed at distance learners (Guri-Rosenbilt & Gros, 2011). Indeed, â€œmost higher education institutions use the new technologies to enhance classroom encounters rather than to adopt a distance teaching pedagogyâ€ (Guri-Rosenblit, 2009, p.108).
Perhaps, the critique of Moore and Kearsleyâ€™s model offered by Schaffer (2005, p.6) â€˜â€™Although they clearly have a systems view in mind, diagrams of this structure cannot begin to capture the full complexity of the DE systemâ€™â€™
Due to the aim of this study that is to assess SSM-Mode 2 as a learning process to explore situation in ODE from the cultural perspective of China. SSM-Mode 2 has more emphasis on understanding a problematic situation from multiple stakeholdersâ€™ and cultural perspectives. So, the researcher classified ODE issues into themes that consider different stakeholders views and cultural context of ODE. These issues have enough thematic similarity to be attributable, with a degree of relevance, to institutional, technological, cultural and learners themes. Institutional issues represent problems face institutionsâ€™ stakeholders such as managers, designers and tutors. Technological issues can face multiple stakeholders involved in ODE and affect their activities. Cultural issues represent social and political problems encountered in ODE system while learnersâ€™ issues represent personal issues of ODE students.
Dimensions in E-Learning Issues
1. Institutional Issues affecting administrative affairs, academic affairs, and student services related to e-learning
2. Management Maintenance of learning environment and distribution of information
3.Technological Issues with technology infrastructure in e-learning environments, including infrastructure planning, hardware and software
4. Pedagogical Teaching and learning issues, such as content analysis, audience analysis, goal analysis, media analysis, design approach, organization and learning strategies
5. Ethical Social and political influence, cultural diversity, bias, geographical diversity, learner diversity, digital divide, etiquette, legal issues
6. Interface Design Overall appearance of e-learning programs, page and site design, content design, navigation, accessibility, usability testing
7. Resource Design Online support and resources for meaningful learning
8. Evaluation Learner assessment, evaluation of instruction and learning environment
Our Service Charter
Excellent Quality / 100% Plagiarism-FreeWe employ a number of measures to ensure top quality essays. The papers go through a system of quality control prior to delivery. We run plagiarism checks on each paper to ensure that they will be 100% plagiarism-free. So, only clean copies hit customers’ emails. We also never resell the papers completed by our writers. So, once it is checked using a plagiarism checker, the paper will be unique. Speaking of the academic writing standards, we will stick to the assignment brief given by the customer and assign the perfect writer. By saying “the perfect writer” we mean the one having an academic degree in the customer’s study field and positive feedback from other customers.
Free RevisionsWe keep the quality bar of all papers high. But in case you need some extra brilliance to the paper, here’s what to do. First of all, you can choose a top writer. It means that we will assign an expert with a degree in your subject. And secondly, you can rely on our editing services. Our editors will revise your papers, checking whether or not they comply with high standards of academic writing. In addition, editing entails adjusting content if it’s off the topic, adding more sources, refining the language style, and making sure the referencing style is followed.
Confidentiality / 100% No DisclosureWe make sure that clients’ personal data remains confidential and is not exploited for any purposes beyond those related to our services. We only ask you to provide us with the information that is required to produce the paper according to your writing needs. Please note that the payment info is protected as well. Feel free to refer to the support team for more information about our payment methods. The fact that you used our service is kept secret due to the advanced security standards. So, you can be sure that no one will find out that you got a paper from our writing service.
Money Back GuaranteeIf the writer doesn’t address all the questions on your assignment brief or the delivered paper appears to be off the topic, you can ask for a refund. Or, if it is applicable, you can opt in for free revision within 14-30 days, depending on your paper’s length. The revision or refund request should be sent within 14 days after delivery. The customer gets 100% money-back in case they haven't downloaded the paper. All approved refunds will be returned to the customer’s credit card or Bonus Balance in a form of store credit. Take a note that we will send an extra compensation if the customers goes with a store credit.
24/7 Customer SupportWe have a support team working 24/7 ready to give your issue concerning the order their immediate attention. If you have any questions about the ordering process, communication with the writer, payment options, feel free to join live chat. Be sure to get a fast response. They can also give you the exact price quote, taking into account the timing, desired academic level of the paper, and the number of pages.